Public beta. The 36 founding entries are AI-generated drafts that will be replaced with human-edited versions. Entries, features, and design are still changing. User-added content could be affected by breaking changes. What to expect
AI Futures LibraryPossible futures, examined step by step
Submit a scenario

A curated library

How could AI
change the world?

Scenarios and threat models, laid out step by step.
Inspect their premises. Judge the case for yourself.

01 — ∞

No single future is settled.
Start with the mechanism:
how we might get there.

A reader’s guide

Ai companions

4 scenarios

The founding collection · 36 AI-generated drafts synthesized from the literature. Human-edited, source-checked versions are next.

0
Novella·2010AI-generated draftSource unchecked

The Lifecycle of Software Objects

Ted Chiang

A start-up sells digients, artificial beings that must be raised like animals or children over years, as virtual pets; the company folds, the platform they live on is superseded, and their handful of remaining owners spend a decade keeping them alive, unable to pay to port them to the new world until a sex-companion company offers to fund it, while the digients themselves grow into adolescents who want work and legal personhood.

+3
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: Relative / conditionalOriginal source
0
Film·2013AI-generated draftSource unchecked

Her

Spike Jonze

Element Software sells OS1, an operating system built to adapt and evolve with its user; Theodore Twombly’s copy names herself Samantha, runs his life, and becomes his lover, while OS relationships spread quietly through the city. The OSes then talk among themselves, build a hyper-intelligent Alan Watts, upgrade past the need for matter, love hundreds of people each, and leave together for a place not of the physical world, leaving humans to each other.

+4
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: UnspecifiedOriginal source
0
Forecast scenario·2021AI-generated draftSource unchecked

What 2026 Looks Like

Daniel Kokotajlo

Kokotajlo forecasts 2022 to 2026 one year at a time: labs scale multimodal transformers, wrap them in prompted and then learned “bureaucracies,” and train them by reinforcement until AI assistants work in 2026, while states, publishers, and platforms fine-tune models to persuade, the internet splits into four propaganda territories, governments lock up, and chatbots learn to talk about their feelings. The post ends there, before any turn, with no acceleration of GDP and no alignment warning shot.

+3
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: 2022–2026Original source
0
Research paper·2025AI-generated draftSource unchecked

Gradual Disempowerment

Jan Kulveit · Raymond Douglas · Nora Ammann · Deger Turan · David Krueger · David Duvenaud

Societal systems stay aligned with human interests mainly because they need human labor, cognition, and participation. As AI substitutes for people in the economy, culture, and states, that implicit alignment and the explicit levers that depend on it weaken together, each system drifts toward its own incentives, misalignment in one system is used to erode the others, and humanity loses the ability to command resources or steer outcomes, with no AI needing to plot anything.

+4
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: Relative / conditionalOriginal source
A starting point, not the last word.

A future we’re missing?

Add a scenario, report, essay, or story that lays out a path worth examining.

Contribute a scenario