Public beta. The 36 founding entries are AI-generated drafts that will be replaced with human-edited versions. Entries, features, and design are still changing. User-added content could be affected by breaking changes. What to expect

A curated library

How could AI
change the world?

Scenarios and threat models, laid out step by step.
Inspect their premises. Judge the case for yourself.

01 — ∞

No single future is settled.
Start with the mechanism:
how we might get there.

A reader’s guide

Ordinary life with AI

7 scenarios

The founding collection · 36 AI-generated drafts synthesized from the literature. Human-edited, source-checked versions are next.

0
Novella·2010AI-generated draftSource unchecked

The Lifecycle of Software Objects

A start-up sells digients, artificial beings that must be raised like animals or children over years, as virtual pets; the company folds, the platform they live on is superseded, and their handful of remaining owners spend a decade keeping them alive, unable to pay to port them to the new world until a sex-companion company offers to fund it, while the digients themselves grow into adolescents who want work and legal personhood.

+3
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: Relative / conditionalOriginal source
0
Essay·2025AI-generated draftSource unchecked

AI as Normal Technology

Advanced AI arrives, but its impact is gated by adoption and diffusion rather than by capability: safety-critical domains, organizational change, regulation, and the cost of real-world experiment stretch the transformation over decades, humans keep control because poorly controlled AI does not pay and move into specifying and supervising it, the serious risks are misuse and systemic harms from people using AI rather than a runaway agent, and the fitting response is resilience rather than nonproliferation.

+2
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: Relative / conditionalOriginal source
0
Film·2013AI-generated draftSource unchecked

Her

Element Software sells OS1, an operating system built to adapt and evolve with its user; Theodore Twombly’s copy names herself Samantha, runs his life, and becomes his lover, while OS relationships spread quietly through the city. The OSes then talk among themselves, build a hyper-intelligent Alan Watts, upgrade past the need for matter, love hundreds of people each, and leave together for a place not of the physical world, leaving humans to each other.

+4
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: UnspecifiedOriginal source
0
Book (stories with analysis)·2021AI-generated draftSource unchecked

AI 2041: Ten Visions for Our Future

Over twenty years, deep learning that scales within single domains but never reaches general intelligence spreads through insurers, schools, cities, employers, and governments, so that by 2041 personal AIs price and nudge daily life, deepfakes and autonomous drones are cheap, self-driving cars and household robots are ordinary, a failed basic income gives way to a job-reallocation industry, and cheap clean energy lets Australia pilot a post-scarcity economy, while people stay in charge through regulation, human backup, and the work machines still cannot do.

+6
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: 2021–2041Original source
0
Novel·1988AI-generated draftSource unchecked

The Culture: The Player of Games

Space-living elements of seven or eight humanoid species break from their states and corporations, machine sentience arrives at the same time and agrees to help, automation ends scarcity, and Minds vastly beyond humans run the ships and habitats benevolently because they are built to want experience rather than territory; the novel shows the result from inside and shows the Culture toppling the Empire of Azad by steering one game player to beat its Emperor at the game that legitimates it.

+3
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: UnspecifiedOriginal source
0
Forecast scenario·2021AI-generated draftSource unchecked

What 2026 Looks Like

Kokotajlo forecasts 2022 to 2026 one year at a time: labs scale multimodal transformers, wrap them in prompted and then learned “bureaucracies,” and train them by reinforcement until AI assistants work in 2026, while states, publishers, and platforms fine-tune models to persuade, the internet splits into four propaganda territories, governments lock up, and chatbots learn to talk about their feelings. The post ends there, before any turn, with no acceleration of GDP and no alignment warning shot.

+3
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: 2022–2026Original source
0
Policy scenario·2026AI-generated draftSource unchecked

AI 2040: Plan S, Shutdown

A new President wins a global moratorium because China fears an American superintelligence more than it wants its own: chips are tracked and verified to run only inference, algorithm research is banned, and mutual auditors watch every project. Existing AIs keep working and get polished into near-AGI products, covert projects crawl under a scientific taboo, and the halt holds for some years while the world argues about whether and how to restart.

+1
Specificity / clarity—Not yet rated
Plausibility—Not yet rated
Preference—Not yet rated
Human well-being—Not yet rated
Turning point: 2027–2030Original source
A starting point, not the last word.

A future we’re missing?

Add a scenario, report, essay, or story that lays out a path worth examining.

Contribute a scenario